<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Cheating, Just Leveling the Playing Field &#8211; Morals, Children, and The Politics of Arcade Redemption Games</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.straightdopedad.com/not-cheating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.straightdopedad.com/not-cheating/</link>
	<description>Fatherhood Advice From a Self Employed Stay at Home Dad. Tricks and Tips for Raising Children.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:04:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.straightdopedad.com/not-cheating/comment-page-1/#comment-7003</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 20:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.straightdopedad.com/?p=269#comment-7003</guid>
		<description>Sorry to tell you, but she&#039;s right, it&#039;s dishonest.  Your reasoning is fundamentally flawed that it&#039;s ok simply because you get less than what you would ordinarily pay for if.  If that was the case, than instead of playing, you should have gone to the store and bought her inexpensive toys for the same price.  But you didn&#039;t because there was more that you were paying for (or supposed to be) - the games.  If there was a better value of games-prizes, you should have gone to a different arcade.  If you see an item in a store that you previously saw cheaper at another store, does that mean it&#039;s not dishonest to take it and leave the exact amount you saw for the other store and walk out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to tell you, but she&#8217;s right, it&#8217;s dishonest.  Your reasoning is fundamentally flawed that it&#8217;s ok simply because you get less than what you would ordinarily pay for if.  If that was the case, than instead of playing, you should have gone to the store and bought her inexpensive toys for the same price.  But you didn&#8217;t because there was more that you were paying for (or supposed to be) &#8211; the games.  If there was a better value of games-prizes, you should have gone to a different arcade.  If you see an item in a store that you previously saw cheaper at another store, does that mean it&#8217;s not dishonest to take it and leave the exact amount you saw for the other store and walk out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Tena</title>
		<link>http://www.straightdopedad.com/not-cheating/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Tena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.straightdopedad.com/?p=269#comment-363</guid>
		<description>This was wonderful, I absolutely agree. And you made wonderful arguements-very practical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was wonderful, I absolutely agree. And you made wonderful arguements-very practical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

